I don’t want Facebook to have any more say in how we communicate over the Internet. Otherwise, technology companies will use decisions like these to exert even more influence and control over our lives.įrom my perspective, the Oversight Board sounds too much like something out of 1984. If we have learned anything over the past five years or so, it’s that we need to look long and hard before allowing Big Tech to expand its spectacular and tentacular reach. No matter how judicial Zuckerberg wants his Oversight Board to appear to be, it’s a Silicon Valley creation. Language like this is the stuff of corporate position papers and annual reports. The board’s role is to ensure that Facebook’s rules and processes are consistent with its content policies, its values, and its human rights commitments.” “It is Facebook’s role to create necessary and proportionate penalties that respond to severe violations of its content policies. Nor would our high court use language such as: 6 severely violated Facebook’s Community Standards,” is something a Supreme Court justice would never write. What's next: The board says that within 90 days it expects to reach decisions that Facebook must act on.Įditor's note: This story has been corrected to state that over 20,000 cases were submitted, not 200,000.“The board found that the two posts by Mr. The challenge for the Oversight Board will be discerning whether users are posting these arguments in good faith or trying to make end runs around Facebook's rules.Our thought bubble: The pattern here is, users are trying to make complex points about thorny issues and Facebook keeps applying literal-minded bans. The only case that was referred to the board by Facebook itself, rather than users, involves the removal of COVID-19 misinformation.Facebook removed the post under its "Dangerous Individuals and Organizations" policy. user who says he intended it to underscore a slide toward fascism in America. The board then selects five members to weigh in on each case, including one member who. The Facebook Oversight Board on Thursday released two rulings overturning Meta's decisions to remove user posts from its platforms, saying the content did not actually violate the company's policies. A quote from Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels appeared in a post by a U.S. How the Facebook Oversight Board works The board takes on cases either referred by the public or Facebook.A user in Brazil posted photos depicting breast cancer to raise awareness, but Facebook took them down because nipples were showing.Decisions made from these significant cases will help. Instead, the group will choose difficult and prominent cases that are globally relevant. Another case involves a user's posting an argument about differing treatment of churches and mosques in Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Oversight Board aims to promote freedom of expression through an independent decision-making process regarding content moderation on Facebook and Instagram. In one case, Facebook removed a user's post quoting violent rhetoric from former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, but the user says the post was intended to spread awareness of the "horrible words.".Three of the six cases address hate speech violations, which Facebook says is one of the most prevalent forms of content removed on its platform aside from nudity.The tiny number of cases getting reviewed speaks to the limits of human oversight on a platform the size of Facebook, as well as to the novelty of the board's process and the complex nature of the cases chosen.ĭetails: The board's six cases, each from a different country around the world, address controversial issues, ranging from terrorism to nudity, and all six represent appeals by users who want to reverse Facebook's decision to take down their posts. Why it matters: The number of submissions speaks to the multitude of people who feel the platform's moderation of their content has wronged them. More than 20,000 people have submitted cases to Facebook's independent Oversight Board since the board started accepting user appeals in October, the organization announced Monday, and it has selected six initial cases for review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |